Analisis Model Penerimaan Teknologi dengan EXT TAM Pada E-learning di Perguruan Tinggi
Keywords:
EXT TAM, E-learning, Penerimaan TeknologiAbstract
Universitas mengutamakan keunggulan pendidikan dengan menggunakan sistem e-learning. Studi ini menganalisis model penerimaan teknologi yang diperluas (EXT TAM) dalam konteks ini untuk menunjukkan dinamika penerimaan teknologi di lingkungan pendidikan e-learning perguruan tinggi. Research ini membutuhkan penafsiran yang lebih baik tentang komponen yang membentuk persepsi siswa dan karyawan akademis terhadap adopsi teknologi. Variabel-variabel penting seperti persepsi kegunaan, persepsi kemudahan penggunaan, dan faktor sosial dievaluasi berdasarkan desain penelitian yang hati-hati. Dengan berfokus pada model EXT TAM, analisis data mendalam memberikan gambaran mendalam tentang bagaimana kombinasi faktor-faktor ini memengaruhi adopsi teknologi di institusi pendidikan tinggi. Penelitian ini tidak hanya menambah literatur tentang penerimaan teknologi, tetapi juga memberi administrator akademis ide tentang bagaimana menggunakan teknologi untuk meningkatkan e-learning perguruan tinggi. Hasil ini diharapkan memberikan dasar untuk pembuatan kebijakan pendidikan yang lebih fleksibel dan beradaptasi dengan tuntutan teknologi di dunia pendidikan saat ini.
References
T. Rosita and R. Fatmasari, “Acceptance of Distance Learning Technology in TechnologyBased Learning Management,” Al-Tanzim J. Manaj. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1191–1201, 2023, doi: 10.33650/al-tanzim.v7i4.5945.
A. T. Lee, R. K. Ramasamy, and A. Subbarao, “Understanding Psychosocial Barriers to Healthcare Technology Adoption: A Review of TAM Technology Acceptance Model and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and UTAUT Frameworks,” Healthcare,
vol. 13, no. 3, p. 250, 2025, doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030250.
H. Y. Durak and A. Onan, “Predicting the Use of Chatbot Systems in Education: A Comparative Approach Using PLS-SEM and Machine Learning Algorithms,” Curr. Psychol., vol. 43, no. 28, pp. 23656–23674, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12144-024-06072-8.
M. A. Hafidz, “Acceptance of e-Learning Applications at Indonesian Universities Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model,” SISTEMASI, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 526, May 2022, doi: 10.32520/stmsi.v11i2.1993.
A. R. N. Salmassi, M. Kazemi, M. Mehraeen, and G. Malekzadeh, “A Review of Most Applicable Theories and Models of Technology Acceptance,” Int. J. Health Sci., pp. 48020–48030, 2022, doi: 10.53730/ijhs.v6ns7.13419.
S. U. R. Khan, M. Anjam, M. A. Faiz, F. Khan, and H. Khan, “Probing the Effects of Transformational Leadership on Employees’ Job Satisfaction With Interaction of Organizational Learning Culture,” Sage Open, vol. 10, no. 2, 2020, doi:
10.1177/2158244020930771.
I. Park, D. Kim, J. Moon, S. Kim, Y. Kang, and S.-S. Bae, “Searching for New Technology Acceptance Model Under Social Context: Analyzing the Determinants of Acceptance of Intelligent Information Technology in Digital Transformation and Implications for the
Requisites of Digital Sustainability,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 579, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14010579.
J. Mohammed, O. Onasanya, and S. Adenubi, “Exploring the Effectiveness of E-Learning: A Scoping Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Research,” Mimb. Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 101–108, 2023, doi: 10.17509/mimbardik.v8i2.68016.
N. S. Aryanti and I. B. Utamajaya, “The adoption of e-learning in higher education: An empirical study using extended TAM,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. IJET, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 45–58, 2022, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v17i08.28973.
D. Fecira and T. M. K. Abdullah, “Analisis Penerimaan E-Learning Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” vol. 02, no. 04.
S. Gado, R. Kempen, K. Lingelbach, and T. Bipp, “Artificial Intelligence in Psychology: How Can We Enable Psychology Students to Accept and Use Artificial Intelligence?,” Psychol. Learn. Teach., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 37–56, 2021, doi: 10.1177/14757257211037149.
I. Purwandani and N. O. Syamsiah, “Analisa Penerimaan dan Penggunaan Teknologi Google Classroom Dengan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” JARTIKA J. Ris. Teknol. Dan Inov. Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 247–255, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.36765/jartika.v3i2.257.
Н. А. Антонова, K. Eritsyan, T. Kazantseva, and R. G. Dubrovsky, “Barriers and Facilitators to Seeking Psychological Assistance in School Education System,” Psychol. Sci. Educ., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 77–87, 2022, doi: 10.17759/pse.2022270408.
M. H. Musriannur, R. Yasirandi, and D. Oktaria, “Pengukuran dan Analisis Penerimaan LMS sebagai Media Belajar Online menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model di Universitas Telkom.”
N. Seliana, A. I. Suroso, and L. N. Yuliati, “Evaluation of E-Learning Implementation in the University Using Delone and McLean Success Model,” J. Apl. Manaj., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 345–352, 2020, doi: 10.21776/ub.jam.2020.018.02.15.
A. R. Febriawan, R. Rohana, and N. Nurhaedah, “Difference in Effectiveness of Conventional Learning and E Learning Using Whatsapp Application in SD Gugus IV Kecamatan Tanasitolo Kabupaten Wajo,” Ijest, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 28, 2022, doi: 10.26858/ijest.v2i1.33907.
Deny and J. F. Andry, “Pengukuran Keberhasilan E-Learning Dengan Mengadopsi Model Delone &Amp; McLean,” J. Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 68, 2018, doi: 10.21456/vol8iss1pp68-75.
F. Arianto, L. H. Susarno, U. Dewi, and A. F. Safitri, “Model Penerimaan Dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi: E-Learning Di Perguruan Tinggi,” J. Kwangsan, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 110, 2020, doi: 10.31800/jtp.kw.v8n1.p110--121.
S. Sukendro et al., “Using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model to Understand Students’ Use of E-Learning During Covid-19: Indonesian Sport Science Education Context,”Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 11, p. e05410, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410.
A. H. M. Nguyen and L. L. Alcantara, “The interplay between country-of-origin image and perceived brand localness: An examination of local consumers’ response to brand acquisitions by emerging market firms,” J. Mark. Commun., vol. 28, no. 1, 2022, doi:
10.1080/13527266.2020.1840422.
M. A. Almaiah, M. M. Alamri, and W. Al-Rahmi, “Applying the UTAUT Model to Explain the Students’ Acceptance of Mobile Learning System in Higher Education,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 174673–174686, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957206.
A. Alshehri, M. Rutter, and S. Smith, “The role of government policy in e-learning implementation in higher education: Evidence from Saudi Arabia,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 6351–6373, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10825-5.
A. Y. Alqahtani, Z. A. Bhatti, and N. Zafar, “Acceptance of e-learning systems in higher education: A systematic review of extended TAM studies,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 2979–3002, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11211-2.
G. M. Disastra and R. Wahyuningtyas, “User Satisfaction of E-Learning System Implementation for Training and Development Program in Organization,” 2020, doi: 10.2991/aebmr.k.200410.038.
D. Aryanti and J. N. Utamajaya, “Persepsi Penggunaan Sistem E-Learning Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” Jurikom J. Ris. Komput., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 479, 2022, doi: 10.30865/jurikom.v9i2.4092
