ChatGPT Menantang Metodologi Pembelajaran Campuran dalam Pendidikan Teknik: Studi Kasus dalam Matematika
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Blended Learning, ChatGPT, Self-Directed LearningAbstract
Penelitian ini mengusulkan penerapan ChatGPT sebagai instrumen inovatif dalam konteks pembelajaran matematika di pendidikan teknik. Dengan fokus pada metode pembelajaran campuran, kami menginvestigasi bagaimana integrasi teknologi model bahasa yang canggih seperti ChatGPT dapat memperkaya pengalaman belajar siswa. Studi kasus dilakukan untuk mengevaluasi dampak penerapan ChatGPT terhadap pemahaman materi matematika dan keterlibatan siswa. Hasil eksperimen menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan ChatGPT secara signifikan meningkatkan keterlibatan siswa dan memfasilitasi pemahaman konsep matematika yang kompleks. Temuan ini mendukung argumen untuk mengintegrasikan kecerdasan buatan dalam konteks pendidikan teknik, menantang paradigma tradisional pembelajaran campuran, dan membuka jalan untuk pengembangan lebih lanjut dalam meningkatkan efektivitas pembelajaran teknis menggunakan teknologi mutakhir.
References
Alghamdi, A. (2023). Students’ Perceptions of AI Tools for Engineering Education: A Study on Flexibility and Accessibility. Education and Information Technologies.
Aljanabi, M. (2023). ChatGPT: Future Directions and Open possibilities. MJCS, 16–17. https://doi.org/10.58496/MJCS/2023/003
Chen, M., Chen, C. C., & Schminke, M. (2023). Feeling Guilty and Entitled: Paradoxical Consequences of Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(3), 865–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05109-x
Choudhury, A., & Shamszare, H. (2023). Investigating the Impact of User Trust on the Adoption and Use of ChatGPT: Survey Analysis (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.47184
Doleck, T., & Lemay, D. (2024). Critical Evaluation Skills in the Age of AI: How Students Validate Automated Outputs. British Journal of Educational Technology.
Dwivedi, Y. K., & others. (2023). ‘So what if ChatGPT wrote it?’ Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Faiz, A., & Kurniawaty, I. (2023). Tantangan Penggunaan ChatGPT dalam Pendidikan Ditinjau dari Sudut Pandang Moral. EDUKATIF: JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v5i1.4779
Gilson, A., & others. (2023). How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e45312. https://doi.org/10.2196/45312
Howard, A., Hope, W., & Gerada, A. (2023). ChatGPT and antimicrobial advice: the end of the consulting infection doctor? The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 23(4), 405–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00113-5
Huang, L., & Wang, D. (2023). Teacher Support, Academic Self-Efficacy, Student Engagement, and Academic Achievement in Emergency Online Learning. Behavioral Sciences, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13090704
Iqbal, M., Rosramadhana, R., Amal, B. K., & Rumapea, M. E. (2018). Penggunaan Google Forms Sebagai Media Pemberian Tugas Mata Kuliah Pengantar Ilmu Sosial. JUPIIS, 10(1), 120. https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v10i1.9652
Lee, J., & Park, S. (2025). Exploring Student Engagement with AI Tools in Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges. Computers & Education.
Liebrenz, M., Schleifer, R., Buadze, A., Bhugra, D., & Smith, A. (2023). Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing. The Lancet Digital Health, 5(3), e105–e106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00019-5
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
Mhlanga, D. (2023). Open AI in Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning. SSRN Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4354422
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2023). Integrating AI in Pedagogical Design: Reflections on TPACK Framework. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development.
Patel, S. B., & Lam, K. (2023). ChatGPT: the future of discharge summaries? The Lancet Digital Health, 5(3), e107–e108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00021-3
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
The Lancet Digital Health. (2023). ChatGPT: friend or foe? The Lancet Digital Health, 5(3), e102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00023-7
Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
Wijonarko, P., & others. (2023). Penerapan dan Kontribusi Kecerdasan Buatan ChatGPT Untuk Menafsir Teks Hukum (Studi Kasus Penafsiran Pasal 10, Pasal 13, Permenkes No.889 Tahun 2011). Jurnal Kajian Teknik Elektro. https://doi.org/10.52447/jkte.v8i2.7061
Zhang, L., & others. (2024). AI Literacy and Pedagogical Strategies in Blended Learning Environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning.
Zickar, M. J., & Keith, M. G. (2024). Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior Innovations in Sampling: Improving the Appropriateness and Quality of Samples in Organizational Research. Downloaded from Www.Annualreviews.Org. Guest (Guest, 10, 43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Educational Studies in Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
